Panel Composition:
The judging panel comprises members from various disciplines to ensure a balanced and multidisciplinary evaluation.

Evaluation Scope:

• In the case of article-based selection, panel members will review and evaluate the research articles.

• In the case of self-nomination, the evaluation will be based on the candidate’s professional profile, including research achievements, publications, impact, and supporting documentation.

Scoring System:
Each criterion will be assessed using a standardized score ranging from 0 to 10, where:

• 0 = Not Demonstrated

• 5 = Meets Expectations

• 10 = Outstanding Performance

Assessment Criteria:
Evaluation will be conducted according to the predefined Research Award Judging Criteria, which include:

• Originality and Innovation

• Scientific Impact

• Methodological Rigor

• Publication Quality

• Societal Relevance

• Leadership and Collaboration

• Sustainability of Research

• Prior Recognitions

Confidentiality and Integrity:
All evaluations will be conducted confidentially, with panel members required to maintain impartiality and declare any conflicts of interest.

Once the committee’s decision is final, an official acknowledgment will be sent to the corresponding winner. This notification will include details regarding the award, ceremony (if applicable), and any further instructions.